The Death Pool (and Other PR Blog Jots)
Rumors of PR's Death Greatly Exaggerated
PR 2.0
In response to a recent post from Guy Kawasaki listing the “Top 10 Reasons Why PR Doesn’t Work,” Brian Solis argues that Guy seems to boil bad PR down to personality conflicts rather than more concrete flaws. Brian thinks rather than the countless posts listing out all the current problems with the communications industry, PR bloggers should be writing about the ways those problems can be corrected. He offers his own list detailing his solutions to certain PR issues. “Rather than highlight what's wrong with PR or why it doesn't work, let's talk about how to fix it. (If you're in tech...please read this article first as it serves as the primer for PR in the face of new media. Web 2.0 marketing has generated many new lessons, strategies, and tools that benefit almost every industry.) No matter what business you're in, there are a few things that can help you succeed in, manage, or measure PR. This list is a game changer and can serve as the foundation for improving PR and elevating its value among those who have been burned by previous experiences.”
Newspapers, on the Other Hand...
Paul Gillin
While PR may still be relevant, newspapers continue their decline at an disturbing pace, according to Paul Gillin. He links to a post from Alan Mutter, who notes that print advertising has reached its lowest levels since the period after 9/11, expecting to dip by up to $2 billion this year. Paul calls the dreary stats reported by Mutter “unprecedented and alarming,” and notes that while the dive in recent years may not constitute a pattern yet, there is definitely panic in the air. “Desperate acts like the San Francisco Chronicle's recent decision to eviscerate its newroom staff indicate that the industry is in panic mode. The Chron is basically committing hara-kiri rather than continuing the fight. I suspect it's only the first of many to do so.”
PR Studies
Richard Bailey serves up the important reminder that grammar and punctuation are essential to effective communication. Linking to a BBC News article with several typos, including the dreaded “effect vs. affect” syndrome, Richard argues that by now the common errors should be at the forefront of everyone’s mind. Sadly, these types of errors wouldn’t be so common if writers and editors took the time to stop and think about them. “Effect or affect; its or it's; compliment or complement. There are some spelling and grammar problems that are so common that they shouldn't catch anyone out anymore (accommodation anyone?). There are so many harder ones to adjudicate between: adviser or advisor; judgment or judgement, focuses or focusses etc.”